Bill O’Reilly Resurrecting Hillary’s Presidential Campaign?
One Democrat's Opinion
Resurrecting Hillary
Bill O'Reilly (of the FOX NEWS Channel) is as ingenious as Hillary, but is he equally duplicitous?: While orchestrating his pose as being both impartial and opposing Hillary's agenda (though self contradictory), O'Reilly has worked a miracle by rescuing Hillary's presidential campaign from imminent destruction, just as certain as if her campaign had been a NASA ship to outer space that malfunctioned and was on a trajectory that would end in a "deep six" collision with the Atlantic Ocean. Apparently O'Reilly, like Hillary, is believable because of the indoctrinated tendency of most people to either ignore or dismiss the most important issues, or have extremely short memories?
Is the intent that of diversion of the public mind from the most important issues, such as the sovereignty of the people of the USA and of other democratic nations? Obviously it is the growing demand for oil plus the US government strangulation of the exploration and development of American resources, that is driving fuel prices upward, added to the international OPEC monopoly.
A candidate, in truth, is his/her history; and certainly not what he/she says while campaigning or providing panaceas to the news media. Like the pretense of the candidates, polls are mostly a method to focus public attention away from urgent needs of the nation, and to serve the interests of those they are paid to promote.
Hillary's history is that of an arch opportunist, since the 1970s. Obama is at least trustworthy in that he actually believes the socialist agenda he preaches. McCain may be just as untrustworthy as Hillary in that he poses as the great protector of America according to the Constitution. However, all three promote the dissolution of the USA by granting through treaties, piece by piece, control of this nation to foreign bureaucrats of the United Nations, the vast majority of whom despise everything either democratic or American.
Also note that O'Reilly, like Chris Matthews and the rest of the news media, disparages or ridicules any opinion not within the agenda of the current controlling minorities at the national level of the Democrat and Republican parties. He refers to all who have alternative ideas as "third parties" or "independents", promoting the impression that if we do not agree with either contemporary platform of the major two parties, we simply do not deserve attention of the news media. Then, do we truly have a "free" press?
Tens of thousands of we long term Democrats, having been forced out of the Party by the opportunistic and socialistic attitudes of those who have commandeered the Party, will be voting for candidates of either the American Independent Party, the Constitution Party, or writing in RON PAUL for president in November. We will not win, but we refuse to throw away our votes by surrendering to the opportunistic/socialistic candidates who represent what most Presidents, especially Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Garfield and Kennedy abhorred, "the money power" that has surreptitiously financed so many leftist candidates, not only in the USA, but around the world (such as Hugo Chávez of Venezuela). A realist has to wonder why the New York and London bankers financed both Vladimir Lenin in establishing the USSR, and Hitler in building the "Third Reich"? Also we must wonder how their contemporary protégés now manipulate both the Democrat and Republican parties candidates? Why do all three current presidential candidates endorse "the money power" agenda of surrendering American sovereignty over our environment, our rights to the minerals under the seas, our space exploration, even our military authority to the United Nations?
How many Americans realize that we are probably the highest taxed population on the planet when considering the myriad of local, county, state, regional and federal taxation; and that we have some of the highest business and industrial taxes worldwide, thus curtailing American ability to export our goods at competitive prices? It is partially these high taxes and costly regulations that drive American industry and business to emigrate to foreign shores!
A. Benton Edmons, editorialist, The Centrist Democrat International
Bellflower, CA, USA
Question: Which were the worst presidents of the 19th and 20th Centuries: The drastic treatment by the Andrew Johnson Administration (1865-69) (after the Lincoln assassination) left the South economically devastated for over 100 years; and Jimmy Carter (1977-81) who continues sabotaging democratic movements around the world even as this editorial is being written!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home